Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/5 Wits


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:19, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

5 Wits

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable corporation, no sources, spammy, needs to go. Honj Adrek (talk) 23:05, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 6 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:17, 12 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unreferenced outside self-ref. As written, clearly fails Notability (organizations). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 00:23, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.