Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/6-plus-6-instruments


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. joe deckertalk to me 22:03, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

6-plus-6-instruments

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No evidence given that "6-plus-6" is a notable type of instrument. While some instruments that fit this description are obviously notable, a web search didn't seem to show this term in general use. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:49, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. This appears to be a promotion for a term newly formulated by a German named Johannes Beyreuther. He evidently is trying to concoct a term to cover a number of extant instruments which, as already observed, are themselves notable. Up to now, however, I could myself invent a competing term ("symmetrical-hexachord keyboards", for example, or "balanced-scale instruments", or "ambidextrous axe"), and it would be equally viable (or non-viable) as a candidate for a Wikipedia article. I think we should wish Herr Beyreuther all the best of luck with his new coinage and, should it eventually catch on, suggest that he bring it back to Wikipedia at that time.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 22:45, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  — --Darkwind (talk) 05:16, 21 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOTE, WP:INDY, and possibly also WP:NEO.  Rich wales (talk · contribs) 22:25, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. per nom. -- Alexf(talk) 14:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.