Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/60 seconds!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  17:16, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

60 seconds!

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable video game. I can't find any reliable references for the topic. [http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/60-seconds! Metacritic is useless].  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   08:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.   Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   08:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I can only immediately find 3 sources, one a press release, one a very very brief "this game exists" article at Kotaku AU, and then a blog written by the developers but posted at Gamasutra. While the latter is a prime source we'd want to use, that really seems to be the only source of any significant content that we'd pull from, and there is otherwise a lack of 3rd party sourcing, so GNG is unfortunately not met. --M ASEM (t) 14:22, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep I found several reviews by searching the tag "60 Seconds Robot Gentleman", and the game was selected as a pick for IndieCade in 2015. Definitely a notable game. Should be moved to 60 Seconds!--ZXCVBNM (TALK) 01:09, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Could you please link these references? By searching using the query you used, here's what I found: Gamasutra written by the dev, official websites (Steam, Twitter, FB, official, etc), and the Wikia. It was a finalist at IndieCade 2015 according to the Steam page, but there is a lack of third-party references for this; not even the IndieCade page says they were a finalist.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   06:37, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Indiecade Page Kotaku Mention Review 1 Review 2 Review 3 Review 4 Review 5 Review 6 Review 7 Although I am not sure how notable the review sources are, but it did get a Kotaku mention which is a bit more major.--ZXCVBNM (TALK) 08:56, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I mentioned the IndieCade page in my message, and nowhere does it give any indication that the game won/became a finalist. The Kotaku page is a good start, but it's pretty much a "well this game is a thing". Check out WP:VG/S for reliable video game sources. Review 1 isn't listed, Epic Brew isn't listed but looks like an unreliable blog; Gamemoir isn't listed and is probably an unreliable blog (hosted of Wordpress, for a start); Sirus Gaming isn't listed and I'm not sure of the reliability; Riot Games is not in English, so I don't know about that site; I don't know about the reliability of Guns and Pixels and it isn't listed on WPVGS; same with ModVive- unsure. --  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   11:22, 1 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete No significant references. Some references to say it exists, but WP:ITEXISTS isn't enough to keep. Smartyllama (talk) 17:25, 2 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.