Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/61 Virginis d


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to 61 Virginis. Liz Read! Talk! 22:43, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

61 Virginis d

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A suspected exoplanet, which seems notable -- but in 2021 it was analyzed in greater depth and confirmed to have been a false positive. So this is not an article about a suspected exoplanet, but rather an article about a measurement artifact between the years of 2009 and 2021 that made it look like there might have been a planet. My recommendation -- since there is some amount of well-written content here -- is to merge it into a section at 61 Virginis and redirect the article. jp×g 20:46, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. jp×g 20:46, 23 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Merge per JPxG. I would also consider removing it from the planetary system table on the 61 Virginis article. Does it need to be removed from the List of exoplanets detected by radial velocity and List of exoplanets discovered between 2000–2009 articles? Praemonitus (talk) 03:22, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Something needs to be done about the first of those lists, it's extremely outdated. SevenSpheres (talk) 01:53, 28 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Merge agree with the reasoning above @JPxG -- Lenny Marks (talk) 04:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Merge agree with the reasoning above @JPxG  — Aldaron • T/C 17:56, 26 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Merge per nom - this should have been a merge proposal rather than an AfD. I'm not sure the planet should be regarded as 100% disproven based on just the Rosenthal paper though, and the databases still list it as "confirmed". SevenSpheres (talk) 01:53, 28 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.