Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/64 Studio (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:56, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

64 Studio
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The topic of this article does not meet WP:GNG; there are too few non-trivial third-party references. The piece cites mainly dead links and primary sources. Mentions in catalogs or exhaustive lists aren't claims of notability. The project has become defunct. Mikeblas (talk) 14:07, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can find only trivial coverage or coverage in non-reliable sources. No evidence of meeting WP:GNG. Safehaven86 (talk) 15:46, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as I'm literally finding nothing else so all we have close to independent sources are the three listed sources, the 2008 AfD is an example of how minimally thoughtful it was then, and this article has no other signs of actual independent notability and substance. SwisterTwister   talk  16:14, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:44, 8 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.