Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/66 Months


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:08, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

66 Months

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Uncertain notability. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 02:22, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @  02:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)


 * long title:


 * Keep per meeting WP:NF. Under the film's long title, numerous sources were found discussing the film directly and in detail: Oxford Times, The Argus, Oxford Mail (1), Oxford Mail (2) and Bicester Advertiser allowing the nominated poor stub to be easily expanded and improved. There are more, but we already have enough to show WP:NPOSSIBLE and WP:BURDEN met.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 05:57, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Update: The 62 characters (28 words) unsourced stub article which was brought to AFD is now a 2437 characters (392 words) well-sourced start class which serves the project with its 10x expansion., does this AFD need to remain open?  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 04:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep: It appears that improvements have been mad and article is on the right track. Garagepunk66 (talk) 05:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.