Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/68 Teeth (Aussie Chomps)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:13, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

68 Teeth (Aussie Chomps)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Schuy m 1 ( talk ) 23:36, 25 November 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.   —Grahame (talk) 01:23, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clearly fails WP:BK. No reliable sources, no awards, no contributions to cinema etc, not a historical author! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.192.80.31 (talk) 09:05, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Might be on the weak side of keep but there appears to be a source here: a better reliable source review can be found here:
 * Meiklejohn, Annette Dale. "68 Teeth." Magpies 20.1 (Mar. 2005): 36-36, Abstract: Reviews the book “68 Teeth,” by James Moloney. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:11, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - Question is not whether a source (reliable or otherwise) is available, it is whether "The book has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the book itself." That source alone does not confer notability, and this fails all of the 5 criteria found in WP:BK


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.