Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/69th Infantry Regiment (New York)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to 69th Infantry Regiment (United States). (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:44, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

69th Infantry Regiment (New York)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Duplicate of 69th Infantry Regiment (United States)  ɱ    (talk  ·  vbm)  01:10, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Merge Bobherry Userspace  Talk to me!   Stuff I have done  02:27, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Merge with 69th Infantry Regiment (United States). Obviously they are parallel articles. Most of the content was created in this article, as can be seen by comparing (this version) of this article with (this version) of 69th Infantry Regiment (United States) from 31 December 2012. A lot of material was copied from this article to the (United States) article in (this edit) in June 2013. Since then they have been edited in parallel, with more edits in this article. So it looks like they should be merged. (Instead of AfD, it might have been better to handle this via the merger process. That is probably still a good idea.) – Margin1522 (talk) 05:16, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep The article  deserve  to be kept. I have no idea why this was nominated for deletion.--Diomadi (talk) 02:30, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nobody is suggesting the information should be deleted, since there's another article on the same regiment. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:37, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge This should never have been posted for deletion (Robert E. Lee gave them their nickname; they landed on Okinawa)Merge keeping both names.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:34, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge. It's the same regiment. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:37, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.