Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/6G telecommunication networks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Scott Burley (talk) 08:02, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

6G telecommunication networks

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

User:C933103 wants this article deleted. i don't know why, i'm adding this article here because he added a PROD, but the PROD tag was removed once, which permanently kills it. Personally i don't care whether the article is deleted or not, because i condiser that it is still too soon, i consider that this article should be recreated in about 1-2 years from now. Pancho507 (talk) 00:31, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * To clarify: the PROD tag was added back by someone else other than me after removal. C933103 (talk) 00:37, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete, as I don't believe Wikipedia has to do the job of forecasting the future. Dannyniu (talk) 01:47, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  Kpg  jhp  jm  02:30, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


 * delete as mortal sin against WP:CRYSTAL. Mangoe (talk) 13:01, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. I added some references, including one that suggests 6G will never exist. If President Trump tweets about something, it sort of becomes notable, even if he is completely wrong about it. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:16, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The article was not nominated for deletion on the ground of not sufficient notability. Also notability are not grandfathered.C933103 (talk) 14:33, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The same thing was said about 5G back in 2013, take a look We can be pretty sure we will have 6, and perhaps 7G in the future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by User: (talk • contribs)
 * In the future is a bad argument when we are talking about now. And the only reason we're actually getting 5G was because LTE failed to long term evolution into pur needs. C933103 (talk) 19:59, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Crystalball. &#x222F; WBG converse 17:44, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as a crystal ball exercise. Carrite (talk) 18:58, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:NOTFUTURE. Spyder212 (talk) 22:48, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTCRYSTAL; and, ...I hope that's a joke. ——  SerialNumber  54129  07:53, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, i changed my mind, i think this article should not be recreated until 6G research and development actually starts or becomes relevant, because, right now, the only ones talking about it are the Chinese and the Finnish (i.e., Huawei and Nokia, for sure). Pancho507 (talk) 16:01, 24 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Weak delete Needs proper rewrite and repost. Germcrow (talk) 12:30, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. With the launch of 5G, people will naturally begin to discuss what comes next, and they already have. Rreagan007 (talk) 06:20, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete 6G is like a fantasy. With the launch of 5G, the Internet speed will increase dramatically. I doubt that we will look up for 6g. Also it is a violation of WP:CRYSTALBALL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masumrezarock100 (talk • contribs) 08:29, 27 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.