Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/6 ft 9 in (2.06 m)

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate wasdelete. Joyous 20:17, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)

6 ft 9 in (2.06 m)
Another height thing. --LeeHunter 01:51, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * I've long suspected certain VFD participants of having a canned response on a keyboard macro. I never thought that I'd be half-longing for the same thing.  The same as for the others: Merge to a single List of people over 2m tall article, or Delete. Uncle G 01:59, 2005 Jan 30 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per previous comments on Votes for deletion/6'4". Megan1967 04:02, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per my comments on Votes for deletion/6' 2". Could I additionally vote to merge all of the vfd votes into one? Thryduulf 19:08, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete them all. Neither encylopedic, nor possible to maintain. Rje 20:23, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * Please delete.Martg76 03:58, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete (including those listed in see also). Nonencyclopedic.  At best merge into a list by height of historical figures or something.  ÅrÐ£nT &dagger; &isin;  07:24, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete all. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 09:13, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - merge relevant into to articles about the people concerned - Skysmith 09:49, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Another pointless height article. ral315 21:43, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)