Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/6ix (producer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 07:40, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

6ix (producer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable music producer. This page not only is not supportable by non-existant reliable sources, but is also written like an advert. Fails GNG. Delta13C (talk) 11:06, 2 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete a non-notable music producer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:11, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - He appeared on these websites here and here which are pretty good websties for a producer. JustDoItFettyg (talk) 15:49, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Agreeing with JustDoItFettyg. JayPe (talk) 16:37, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: Those sources are not enough to generate an article of a person who has passed notability guidelines. Please see WP:MUSIC and WP:TOOSOON. The article must be based on multiple independent sources that cover the subject in-depth. I am not seeing any mainstream coverage or a substantial amount of coverage in niche but reliable sources. Delta13C (talk) 22:05, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:37, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable per WP:MUSIC Laurdecl talk 07:00, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 09:22, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 09:22, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:13, 11 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as nothing for genuine substance and the sources offered are not the expectations of meaningful improvements, the article has nothing else convincing and there's no inherited notability from others. SwisterTwister   talk  05:56, 15 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.