Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/6jkmaple

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty 09:52, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

6jkmaple
Non-notable blog, 5 days old, doesn't even have its own website. Zoe 06:46, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Blog and forum vanity. If Maple Story gets notable, by all means, write an article, but please get priorities straight and write about the subject and not the sites attached to it. - Mgm|(talk) 08:10, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Aparently the game is notable already. Drop of the links on Talk:Maple Story and let the editors working there decide whether they're worth it to include. - Mgm|(talk) 08:12, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete what Mgm said - basically the last thing wp needs are links to every blog, let along PAGES about them, LOL -- Ryan Norton T 10:41, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete linkcruft. --DrTorstenHenning 11:45, 24 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Do not delete singaporeboy. this site is also informative about Maple Story. It can become a hit among Maple players and bring more people to Wikipedia! Also, why must blogs have websites? This is such a pathetic statement. Blogs and forums are not vain, for MacGyverMagic's information.
 * Blogs may not be vain, but articles about them are. Especially blogs that are less than a week old.  Zoe 19:28, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * (Referring to Zoe's statement) singaporeboy. First of all, vain means unsuccessful or useless; of no value. The value of a blog is not up to us to decide, unfortunately. Wikipedia has to accomodate the presence of a blogosphere. Perhaps Wikipedia could start up a Blog directory by the name of Wikiblogs?
 * Delete - not notable - T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  16:26, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. --tranquileye 19:26:27, 2005-08-29 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable linkcruft. *drew 07:26, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.