Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/6loWPAN


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep. —Centrx→talk &bull; 05:02, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

6loWPAN
An IETF working group. Article created by user:6lowpan.com and already deleted once as promotional material. But I would be happier if had an AfD debate before it gets deleted again. -- RHaworth 17:43, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Neutral. _Exceptionally_ boring article, but a (potentially) notable subject and not pushing any sort of commercial venture.  I wouldn't mind seeing it deleted, but I can't think of any concrete reasons why it should be. Tevildo 18:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Dull but worthy. But what about a bit of wikification? Fiddle Faddle 19:04, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep All encyclopedia articles can't be exciting. And I already tagged it for a wikify but someone took it off. I'll put another up. BJK 19:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with IETF Working Group. I would much rather see each of these groups (of which there are dozens) get a pithy summary of what it is they do instead of this monster. Recury 19:55, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep 6lowpan.com is not a company, but just a user name chosen by a student. As the advisor of the students, I don't believe the text is a promotional material, and if it contains such contents, I will modify under through review. The motivation of this writing is just to introduce the terminology 6lowpan and the related activities in IETF because the terminology is not such a frequently used one. Also, I am aware that the text should not be the original research. I tried to include only the works at IETF. One thing to change is that the terminology 6loWPAN should be changed to 6lowpan or 6LoWPAN. Prof. Ki-Hyung Kim 08:16, 27 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.