Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/6mm Optimum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 00:20, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

6mm Optimum

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not appear to be a notable concept, unable to find WP:RS or WP:SIGCOV. PROD was rejected because a magazine article exists, but that is a primary source written by the person who created this hypothetical round. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk)  17:54, 16 March 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:10, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:02, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - There is no independent coverage about this concept. It's just one person's opinion on an optimal caliber. -- Whpq (talk) 22:12, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - one non-notable person's opinion is original research; writing about that is an essay, not an encyclopedia article. I could have been gentler in 2006, but in 2024, everyone knows what a hunting license is, and that we are not Hyde Park Corner. Go to X or what they used to call Twitter. Bearian (talk) 19:52, 26 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.