Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/6th Carrier Air Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was DELETE. -Splash - tk 18:23, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

6th Carrier Air Group

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This one-line stub contains the reason for deletion right in it: "... it was never formed." There's nothing to say about it because it never existed. Furthermore, it would seem that the Internet at large agrees that there's nothing to say about it, making it unverifiable. This could never grow beyond a few sentences without vastly duplicating information already present in other articles. - Revolving Bugbear 20:11, 4 November 2007 (UTC) *Keep & Expand I don't agree that this is not significant. The planning and reasoning behind such a plan may be facinating. This is certainly notable if it reached the point of receiving an official designation. Lack of text and lack of research does not by itself demonstrate a non-notable topic. --Kevin Murray 00:31, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's essentially an orphan too, indicating it has no use as a placeholder either. I suppose a merge to Fleet Air Arm is possible but not likely to see much use. --Dhartung | Talk 23:02, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * This appears to be a designation for one carrier and the support vessels in the Royal Navy. It seems that this is not unique and fairly minor. --Kevin Murray 15:45, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Zero results in Google Books. Zero results in Google Scholar. Zero results in Google News Archive. So, you first, Kevin. --Dhartung | Talk 05:37, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment if there is an article on planning for operations extending beyond the actual end of the war (for instance, had the war continued), then this subject might fit well as a merge. I reserve my recommendation until I find such an article. I note, though, that a lack of sources almost certainly guarantees this article's deletion. ZZ Claims~ Evidence 02:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletions.   — FayssalF  -  Wiki me up®  11:54, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Any notable info can go in Fleet Air Arm Buckshot06 15:41, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.