Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/70's Dinner Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 20:09, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

70's Dinner Party
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find significant coverage for this album. Joe Chill (talk) 21:11, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Compilation albums shouldn't be on wiki. They're just released by record companies making extra money on their back catalogue.Sargentprivate (talk) 21:33, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * There are notable compilation albums. Joe Chill (talk) 21:34, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - One of my earlier articles when I hadn't been here very long. Not many references for it, althouogh it does exist. I've no objections to it being deleted if that's the consensus. TheRetroGuy (talk) 21:36, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * In that case, why not userfy it instead? THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 02:44, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Userfication is useful if the editor thinks that he can find sources in the near future, but not in time for the AfD, or if he has another erason to believe tha t he can improve the article to an acceptable result. If the editor does not intend to significantly improve an article (e.g. because he has done all he can already the first time around, or because he agrees that the arguments for deletion will remain valid no matter how hard he works on the article), then userfication is pointless. Fram (talk) 14:33, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Not sure whether I can improve it, but I'm happy to give it a go if someone wants to move it to my userspace. I'm assuming I'm not allowed to move it myself while this discussion is in progress? TheRetroGuy (talk) 13:07, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - If userfying is being considered, as was suggested above, I submit that it might be better to move this article to WP:INCUBATOR, a new project that is essentially the same as the userfy option, except it's in a central area, in the project namespace. The advantages of incubation over userfication are that more eyes will see the article, and that it won't sit there indefinitely out of sight if no improvement occurs. Thanks for your consideration. -GTBacchus(talk) 09:58, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  22:57, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. No claim to notability, nor can one be made. Wikipedia is not supposed to be a mirror of allmusic.com. Bongo  matic  01:30, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.