Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/72andSunny


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica1000 04:09, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

72andSunny

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Page created by the company. Promotional in that we are told nothing other than the awards it claims to have won (one is unverified). otherwise fails Notability (organizations and companies)  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  13:28, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 27 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 05:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Keep The article as nominated was a barely-referenced stub. But I found a lot of coverage in a search. I have added half a dozen references to the article and I think it easily meets WP:CORP. --MelanieN (talk) 23:37, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per references discovered by MelanieN. Northern   Antarctica   ₵  02:21, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:43, 10 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - the additions to the article look to be enough to establish notability for this company.  Gongshow   talk  03:46, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.