Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/777 Charlie (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:32, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

777 Charlie
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&page=777_Charlie  Chief Minister      (Talk)   09:33, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   Chief Minister      (Talk)   09:33, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep as no reason for deletion has been given; the former article's deletion log is not relevant here. Please also see User talk:Ivanvector/Archive 15 regarding this article's acceptance via AfC. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 10:17, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Okay thanks for information. Chief Minister      (Talk)   10:28, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:29, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:29, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep per Ivanvector above. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 11:00, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep The deletion/protection log from three years ago is irrelevant now. Passes WP:NFF easily. M4DU7 (talk) 14:28, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep The film's production is covered substantially, meets WP:NFF. -- Ab207 (talk) 15:05, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * keep As the production is notable and the movie is about to release. 1друг (talk) 15:21, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep The film's details are covered substantially, meets WP:NFF. -- Mruthunjaya9 (talk) 01:52, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep I have been following the news since the article was created during the film was announced. Previously, an article was deleted because the article was created by a banned user. Also, there was lack of references. Film is announced and trailer is also out. Trailer has set few records. I believe Wikipedia is there to share worlds knowledge. If we do not have such a trending topic on Wikipedia, I don't know what article meets the policy. Of course, the article should be improved. Also, I notice User:Vedbas is quite new editor. I feel user did not understand AfD yet. My strong reccomendations are please go through policies and read through Wikipedia:Notability (films). --Gopala Krishna A (talk) 04:40, 12 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * Keep This article meets Wikipedia general notability guidelines.Manasa cp18 (talk) 05:57, 12 June 2021 (UTC)