Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/786 Cosmetics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 19:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

786 Cosmetics

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NCORP   scope_creep Talk  12:45, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:52, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:52, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep since nomination I have found 2 more good sources and added. There are more in Google news, but they were not from notable publications. But I feel there is enough coverage on this one to justify a keep, specially the best publications include Peta.org (2 mentions, I didn't add the 2nd one) and Allure magazine.Expertwikiguy (talk) 00:23, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:45, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: This reads like an advertisement and I do not believe it satisfies WP: ORGCRIT. Celestina007 (talk) 08:10, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete- as per Celestina007. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 07:43, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article looks like an advertisement, the sources look like advertisements, all the Google results for the company name look like advertisements. There's absolutely nothing in sight that looks like independent third-party coverage. What would there be to cover? The only thing that looks remotely close to news coverage is this post from PETA, which... well, it looks remotely close to news coverage. But it isn't. jp×g 06:12, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Being included in a list of beauty companies in a beauty magazine (Allure) does not strike me as significant coverage and neither do any of the other references. Lennart97 (talk) 13:04, 18 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.