Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/79-tone tuning


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. TigerShark 09:35, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

79-tone tuning
Original research (only major contributor is Ozan Yarman, who created the system), no verifiable sources, organized as step-by-step instructions and tables of data rather than an encyclopedia article. —Keenan Pepper 03:51, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can work out the frequencies for any number of tones on a scale myself. But why bother? - Richfife 04:28, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: It's not 79 equally spaced tones in an octave, if that's what you're thinking. —Keenan Pepper 04:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Q Wikisource material? ~ trialsanderrors 06:01, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:NOR. --Coredesat 06:24, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research.  (aeropagitica)    (talk)   06:53, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Robertsteadman 09:18, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy redirect to Musical tuning. If, and only if, a good verifiable source other than the originator's website can be cited, then this would deserve a one or two-sentence summary at Musical_tuning. Dpbsmith (talk) 19:27, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.