Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/7:22 (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 11:49, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

7:22
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non notable gathering. References are primary sources and any note could easily be covered in the Church article. Previous AfD in 2007 was hardly a landslide, and the only real reason for keep was a mention in the Atlanta Journal. I think that is considered typical trivial coverage. Shadowjams (talk) 23:03, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the nominator about the trivial (and entirely local) nature of the coverage. Ubelowme U  Me  23:15, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:05, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:05, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:05, 12 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - A small group, local in nature, without significant coverage. -- Whpq (talk) 16:31, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Qworty (talk) 21:23, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete -- sounds like a NN local Bible-study discussion group. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:19, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.