Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/7PPrinciple

Article 7 P Principle listed on WP:VFD Apr 21 to Apr 27 2004, consensus was to delete. Discussion:


 * Errrr... has anyone heard of this? And if so, why does it need to be an article?  Isomorphic 22:41, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is a real principle. If you delete this, then why not delete the article about Murphy's Law and its children? Auric The Rad 22:46, Apr 21, 2004 (UTC)
 * Murphy's Law is very well-known and has an interesting history. What more is going to be said about the 7 P Principle? Isomorphic 23:50, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * It is real. No vote on whether it is encyclopedic. Rossami 22:48, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Seems like second-rate pep-talk material to me. Unencyclopedic. Rhymeless 04:43, 22 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Stupid sayings seldom survive serious scrutiny. Delete. Soon. Denni 06:56, 2004 Apr 22 (UTC)
 * Strictly speaking, such statements sustain speedy silencing. I mean deletion.  Postdlf  00:19  23 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * We wish weak, worthless writing would wither without warranting Wikipedian warfare... Delete. Pteron 06:37, 23 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-encyclopedic and no real hope of expansion.  If someone can expand it a la Murphy's Law, it should stay.  Otherwise:  Dumb dicdefs don't deserve due distribution, dammit.  Next...? - Lucky 6.9 04:46, 24 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Sounds like the sort of thing that Guss from Drop The Dead Donkey would come out with. Funny.  Delete. -- Graham  :) | Talk 21:14, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - Don't detain dumb diction's destruction - T&#949;x &#964; ur&#949; 15:35, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Recommend deleting this article, saving this discussion. Well, okay. Not. Denni 16:21, 2004 Apr 26 (UTC)

End discussion