Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/7Seas (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Phoenix Global Intelligence Systems. If that article gets deleted, then this redirect will be deleted under WP:CSD. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 06:02, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

7Seas
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

It appears to be a duplicate article. Apparently, this organization was renamed a long time ago and now has another Wikipedia article Phoenix Global Intelligence Systems  The history of the organization can easily be incorporated there and given a redirect. Malke 2010 (talk) 21:40, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Modification after discussion I'm modifying this AfD after discussing it with Whpq.  This article is not sourced and it's only references online refer back to Shannen Rossmiller.  After a Google search on her and the reliable sources about her, it seems she didn't really perform any function for 7Seas and it appears this group was in fact more of a friendship/information cooperative.  She has said in interviews in Wired and other RS, that she didn't really share anything with this group and the group had nothing to do with the cases she's notable for.  The article isn't sourced, the group no longer exists and doesn't seem notable, so I'm nominating that it be deleted on that basis.  Certainly, mention of it can be kept in Rossmiller's BLP, but as far as having it's own article, it seems it doesn't meet the standard.  I'm also going to nominate Phoenix Global Intelligence Systems here:  for the same reasons.  Thanks.  Malke 2010 (talk) 21:11, 13 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 *  Procedural close  - The nominator is proposing to either merge the article, or redirect the article, none of which are deletion actions. AFD is not the venue to propose such actions, and in this case, boldly merging them would have made sense. -- Whpq (talk) 17:08, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm proposing deleting it. The Phoenix Global Intelligence Systems article already has mention that it was once called 7Seas.  Malke 2010 (talk) 17:58, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Reply - The nomination specifically states "The history of the organization can easily be incorporated there and given a redirect" without a single mention of deletion. But regardless, the a redirect would be appropriate as a former name of the org. -- Whpq (talk) 18:41, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Reply - Okay, no problem. Malke 2010 (talk) 19:23, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

AS the nominator has adjusted the nomination rationale, I now suggest Redirect to Phoenix Global Intelligence Systems as this is just an older name for the same organisation. Notability of Pheonix will be addressed at that article's AFD -- Whpq (talk) 17:30, 14 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Some refs appear not to mention topic. I also marked some dead links. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:07, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.