Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/7ujuh (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speed deleted per WP:G5. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:20, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

7ujuh (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NFF draftified once already but moved back with insufficient sources. In a before search only routine stuff like this. WP:TOOSOON Dom from Paris (talk) 15:21, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:21, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:21, 25 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Draft move back to draft for AFC as there is not much coverage now but it is released 8 November so there could be reviews in reliable sources then in which case it can be accepted at AFC. Any moves back without AFC could be reverted if this AFD closes on drafting, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 13:09, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The page has already been draftified once and the creator recreated it and so effectively objected to the draftification and as such I do not think we can DRAFTIFY again hence this AfD as per WP:DRAFTIFY. Dom from Paris (talk) 14:03, 30 October 2018 (UTC)


 * An AFD decision to draft carries more weight as per the second paragraph of WP:DRAFTIFY: "Articles may be moved to become a draft as a result of a deletion discussion, indirectly following deletion and a request for undeletion. When performing such a move, link to the original deletion discussion and the decision to move the article into draftspace. Authors should try to understand and respond to the reason for moving to draft status, and then use the AfC submission process to have the page moved back to mainspace. The author is encouraged to ask other editors questions, or to use the Help me template." so it suggests a move back to mainspace after an AFD draftify has to be through AFC, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 15:44, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah Ok, that makes sense, I must admit I hadn't read it like that because this "indirectly following deletion and a request for undeletion." threw me! Dom from Paris (talk) 16:36, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Szzuk (talk) 16:35, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Move Back to draft. Has quite a few notable actors so there is a large chance it will receive suitable coverage. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 17:03, 1 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree with User:Domdeparis initial nomination. Poorly constructed article, actors aren't especially notable, and notability is not inherited. Even if actors are notable, doesn't mean the film is. LikeMeercats (talk) 17:24, 1 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.