Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/8038472


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The snowball is rolling. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:07, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

8038472

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable number with no assertion of any significance: PRODded, but can we please speedy/snow delete it so that it doesn't clutter the encyclopedia for a week. Pam D  08:29, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy delete per A11. Not worth categorising this AfD. Nordic  Dragon  10:57, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Someone tried that, but it was reverted on the basis that the number isn't "invented": its notability is certainly invented, so can we argue that way I wonder? Pam  D  11:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * "(A11) applies to any article that plainly indicates that the subject was invented/coined/discovered (...)" - it seems hard to argue for the speedy under A11. Tigraan Click here to contact me 12:26, 25 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NUMBER: no cultural notability, and I did not find any interesting properties either. FWIW, the prime factorization is 2^3*13*37*2089. Tigraan Click here to contact me 12:35, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:52, 25 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NUMBER.  " Pepper "  @ 03:52, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:SNOW delete. No hint of notability listed or findable. No hits in OEIS nor Google Scholar. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:56, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * speedy / snow delete per nom; no indication at all it deserves an article.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 04:01, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * delete; no notability. Magidin (talk) 14:17, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Can't imagine this will significantly impact the vote, but Delete it. DaltonCastle (talk) 02:41, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - no claim of importance. Rlendog (talk) 19:06, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:A7 still does not apply. This is not a real person, individual animal(s), organization, web content or organized event. Tigraan Click here to contact me 09:21, 29 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete Fails notability. Jschnur (talk) 00:14, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete no notability whatsoever. Boleyn (talk) 16:38, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * SNOW Delete anyone? Clearly not an acceptable article.  SwisterTwister   talk  00:13, 2 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.