Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/80s Classic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Has already been CSDed by User:Smartse. —Tom Morris (talk) 19:23, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

80s Classic

 * – ( View AfD View log )

DICDEF, NEO, not an accepted term solely for movies, notability of the term as a stand alone concept not established. Dennis Brown (talk) 16:10, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Yes, the title is ambiguous and the topic is already well developed under 1980s in film. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:13, 10 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep No, this is a socially relevant article. Bravo Plantation (talk) 16:15, 10 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. With no sources, this is WP:OR.  With sources, it is redundant to 1980s in film and, considering the "classic" title, List of films considered the best.  matt (talk) 16:19, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -- Joaquin008  ( talk ) 16:24, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * db-a10 is in my opinion applicable here, the duplicated article is 1980s in film. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:27, 10 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Duplicate information as 1980s in film. The examples posted by the OP in this article are pure POV. -- Alexf(talk) 16:30, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Go on, delete it then. I was just trying to make a socially relevant article but it looks like you lot have already made your mind up without giving it a chance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bravo Plantation (talk • contribs) 10 February 2012
 * Actually, it is that your article was already created, yours would have been a duplicate. See 1980s in film Dennis Brown (talk) 16:33, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually, I don't give a rats ass. Talk to the hand girl-friend. Bravo Plantation (talk) 17:09, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.