Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/88 Films


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 23:59, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

88 Films

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Outdated, badly sourced article that has a strong smell of advertising. No evidence that is satisfies WP:GNG The Banner talk 13:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * KEEP - searching through Google News seems to indicate a massive pile of related news clippings. Perhaps the article needs to be better sources and more NPOV written, but its noteworthy and should be included. Zlassiter (talk) 13:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I really don't see the advertising here, it's simply poorly sourced, because there aren't really sources available, and what is available is announcements of releases and the like. I see some appreciative comments about the company in DVD reviews, but really not enough coverage to justify an article. --Michig (talk) 14:30, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:41, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:41, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:41, 10 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: I'm seeing lots of trivial and incidental mentions, but no WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS. Safehaven86 (talk) 00:30, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced article, and no evidence that there are available sources on this company. Dimadick (talk) 17:21, 12 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect (with a partial merge) to list article List of 88 Films releases.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 12:09, 15 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.