Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/8 Water New Zealand


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:29, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

8 Water New Zealand

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Self promotional article about a non-notable company by parties with a potential conflict of interest NealeFamily (talk) 22:11, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2017 August 14.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 22:32, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:54, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:54, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:54, 14 August 2017 (UTC)


 * COI and likely sock account removed the advert tag. Going to issue first level warning and take to SPI if I have time. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:56, 14 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable and reads like an advertisement. NZ Footballs Conscience  (talk) 03:01, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete As per nom. Promotional. Creator and several SPA contributors have clear COI. DerbyCountyinNZ  (Talk Contribs) 04:06, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Promotional and not notable. CoolieCoolster (talk) 11:56, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Promotional, please read What Wikipedia is not — Preceding unsigned comment added by Builder8360 (talk • contribs) 11:56, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
 * FYI, every SPA editor in this case has been blocked for sockpuppetry. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:16, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Easy Delete – Promotional, fails my two tests, and editors blocked for sockpuppetry. Sorry.  J 947(c) (m) 03:35, 21 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.