Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/8mm Fuzz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Opabinia regalis 01:01, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

8mm Fuzz


NN band. humblefool&reg; 05:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC) *Keep per Psilosybical. Meets criterion 5.--Kchase T 23:22, 27 November 2006 (UTC) I must have been smoking crack when I wrote that before. I meant criterion eleven, about rotation, but that's only for national rotation. Delete, fails WP:MUSIC.--Kchase T 19:18, 30 November 2006 (UTC) Arrrggghh! OK. 'Keep again. Same reasoning, multiple non-trivial published works.--Kchase T 00:17, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn band. Kukini 05:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:MUSIC. MER-C 05:14, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable. Also seems to be a glowing review.  Cat tleG irl  '' talk 09:14, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:MUSIC; article reads like promotional material, too. B.Wind 10:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep The band has been featured in a major Boston publication on several occasions in one year (as cited), and is in rotation on a Boston radio station. They are not a national act, but a very popular local act. And I disagree that there is a slant to this article; if you feel strongly that there is, feel free to edit it out. Either way, it meets the minimum requirements for a musical act to be in Wikipedia (see #5) so there is no reason to delete it. Psilosybical&reg; 09:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC) Keep The order of the rules changed; Now #1 applies. It meets the criteria about being in multiple non-trivial published works, whatever the number happens to be on whatever given day.PsilosybicalPsilosybical&reg; 19:10, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * On balance, Delete as seems to fail WP:MUSIC. WMMartin 17:54, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable in any way, shape, or off-key note. Chris Buckey 05:18, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly meets the criteria for multiple non-trivial published works.  The Boston Herald and The Weekly Dig are obviously notable periodicals with high circulation.Whiskeyheart 00:59, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.