Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/8th Georgetown (South) Sea Scout Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete  (aeropagitica)   17:06, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

8th Georgetown (South) Sea Scout Group
non-notable local Scout group; vanity jergen 09:11, 31 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment. You are a hard man, Jergen. Surely there is somewhere some of this can be saved. --Bduke 10:57, 31 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment. There was no content in the article except the weblink when I proposed it for deletion. --jergen 13:12, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. OK. I agree it must go. --Bduke 20:26, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. This is a possible copyright violation from http://08online.blogspot.com/2000/01/our-history.html . Thus, as an article created less than 48 hours ago and containing what is largely an un-wikified block of text, it may qualify for speedy deletion, criteria A8. &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 14:15, 31 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Never mind, I reverted it to a previous version. No vote. &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 14:17, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - as above. For great justice. 16:46, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, totally non-notable, uninformative, vanity. -- P199 16:53, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

''==Local articles== Generally, an entity smaller than a Council should not have its own article. Districts and troops, for example, should only have their own article if its done something very unique. Council articles should be structured by state/province, etc. (see RulesStandards talk page)'' Having local unit articles is vain and would create too many articles to organize is an effective manner. With the copyvio removal here, there is nothing useful to keep; but if there is something useful, it should go into the Malaysian Scouting article. Rlevse 18:44, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge whatever is useful here into Persekutuan_Pengakap_Malaysia, see Scouting WikiProject guideline on local unit articles WikiProject_Scouting/RulesStandards:
 * Obviously delete per nom and as non-notable club (and, if there is useful content, merge per Rlevse). Joe 19:04, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. RGTraynor 19:16, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Local interest only. Piccadilly 20:08, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - too local. --Khoikhoi 03:17, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete far too local interest. No one will be interested in this in 100 years and no one outside that area would be interested today. Cool3 22:12, 1 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.