Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9.1x20 RUCM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 01:35, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

9.1x20 RUCM

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article specifically states there are no reliable sources available, Seems WP:TOOSOON and also has quite a bit of WP:PUFFERY in the language. InsertCleverPhraseHere  20:58, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:47, 25 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete; meets NOTADVERTISING.  Schwede 66  08:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - way TOOSOON. "No links or sources available at this stage due to early development and marketing issues" = "I could not even get a specialized journalist to write about me". Tigraan Click here to contact me 16:40, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:TOOSOON Atlantic306 (talk) 23:57, 2 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.