Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9000


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy deleted as a joke article. Thue | talk 18:47, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

9000
Nonsense article about a nn number. Draeco 23:30, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Tonywalton | Talk 23:37, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --ManiacK 23:39, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Rory096 00:01, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete no claim of notability. &mdash;This user has left wikipedia 01:27 2006-02-02
 * Speedy delete as patent nonsense, I think. Maybe stretching it a bit, but I'd call for a WP:SNOW. Stifle 16:26, 3 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.