Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/911 controversy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Redirected. NawlinWiki 19:45, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

911 controversy

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No sources to back up statements... lacks neutrality... 9/11 conspiracy theories page already exists with relevant theories D 17:30, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, WP:SOAPBOX. Advocacy page that belongs on an op-ed blog, not in an encyclopedia.  Ravenswing 17:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 9/11 conspiracy theories. This one reads like an essay and violates WP:NOR. meshach 17:46, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to 9/11 conspiracy theories. Current content fails WP:ATT and WP:NPOV, is clear original research, and is controversial enough that we shouldn't give it the benefit of the doubt. Merge any useful content, delete the rest (unless sources are added). Wal  ton  Vivat Regina!  17:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * WP:SNOW redirect; legitimate page on topic already exists, this version is completely unencyclopedic and little more than a POV essay. It's not sticking around. (|--   UlT i MuS  18:06, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * In fact, I'm taking the initiative to redirect it myself. Sysops: please just close this. (|--   UlT i MuS  18:06, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.