Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/92 (Chorley) Squadron


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus is that the article is not notable. Davewild (talk) 17:43, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

92 (Chorley) Squadron

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A local branch of a national organisation. The article offers nothing to indicate notability and fails WP:ORG Nuttah (talk) 10:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.   -- Xymmax  So let it be written   So let it be done  11:25, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.   -- Xymmax  So let it be written   So let it be done  11:26, 24 August 2008 (UTC)


 * ATC squadrons have tended to be deleted in the past, as I recall (see eg/ here), and there's nothing remarkable about this one. Shimgray | talk | 19:02, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Wknight94 (talk) 14:40, 1 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Local branches such as this are almost invariably nn, and I see nothing unusual here. Mayalld (talk) 14:54, 1 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak delete hate to say it, but I can't see a reason why ATC squadrons should be de facto notable (Notable exceptions obviously welcome). I'd love to see a list article for them all and most of the content here deserves to be somewhere (but just the once) as a description of ATC squadrons in general. Otherwise this is somwhere between WP:NN and WP:NOTWEBHOST. Sorry. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:21, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Just one of many hundred of Air Training Corps squadrons none are really notable. Lot of the content is described at Air Training Corps. MilborneOne (talk) 17:21, 5 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.