Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9361


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy Delete. Deleted as part of mass deletion. (non-admin closure) Jbh  Talk  02:27, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

9361

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is not necessary, astronomical events can be placed on 100th century article   CatcherStorm    talk   18:51, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Why not? Robert McClenon (talk) 18:52, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - This and all similar distant future one-off astronomical articles. Combine by centuries or millennia or something... Carrite (talk) 19:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Surely these and the other 9000s articles serve no useful purpose. The only thing they mention relate to astronomical events which could easily be placed elsewhere and any other possible content would surely fail WP:TOOSOON and WP:BALL given they are more than 7000 years in the future. Dunarc (talk) 20:51, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Ugh. Yes, it has some 'Astronomical Events' but so does any other year; we could probably add a million or more articles through some auto-bot generation. Unlikely to be every useful, by the time we get to near that year, I am sure we will progress beyond encyclopedic wiki style of knowledge creation :) Anyway, fails WP:N. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 21:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:NOTFUTURE, all the others as well.  J 947  00:49, 2 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.