Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/93 Feet East (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:51, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

93 Feet East
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

shocking article. completely unreferenced. just a few lines of promotional text. Rayman60 (talk) 16:25, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:35, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:35, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:35, 19 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete: This is a WP:G11 candidate if I've ever seen one. No assertion of notability is made, and it is basically a sales brochure. Safehaven86 (talk)
 * Speedy Delete completely promotional and non-notable. MB 16:47, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I would speedy it myself it if hadn't somehow existed since 2004, and looking at the history it's never been any better than this. The things you find in the far reaches of Wikipedia ... - David Gerard (talk) 17:03, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 93 Feet East is actually a pretty well-known live music venue in east London: I've seen several gigs there. But yeah, that doesn't count as evidence of notability, and apart from this article in London's Evening Standard when the club was forced to close down for a few months in 2013, there's nothing else I can find, so delete. Richard3120 (talk) 18:43, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: Indeed, I am familiar with the venue too, expected notability as it is of *some* importance in the London night scene....however appears not to quite have anything beyond listings etc. Also am shocked at how that article stood in that form for over 2 years!!!!!Rayman60 (talk) 23:09, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * As the venue is part of the redevelopment of the old Truman's Brewery on Brick Lane I agree with a point in the previous AfD that you could well get an interesting article out of the brewery's redevelopment, and therefore there might be more coverage of the venue in an architecture or construction magazine rather than a music magazine. A redirect to Black Eagle Brewery is also a possibility here. Richard3120 (talk) 01:08, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I am finding some sourcing, like Evening Standard, The Guardian and NME. A redirect is fine with me, or else just trying to start this article over from scratch. Safehaven86 (talk) 01:20, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I would quite like to see a good rewrite, even a short one. It's the sort of thing that is plausibly notable, but the sourcing is proving the difficult part - David Gerard (talk) 10:14, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment I've just made myself WP:INVOLVED by declining the speedy deletion. I just suggest that options other than outright speedy deletion should be considered. AfD is not for cleanup, but it's also for looking into other solutions. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 09:13, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PROMO; strictly advertising with content such as:
 * "Available for hire for corporate conferences and business meetings, birthday parties as well as showcases, screenings, photo shoots, filming and more."
 * K.e.coffman (talk) 01:46, 22 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.