Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/940s in Denmark


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) — ΛΧΣ  21™  00:25, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

940s in Denmark

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It doesn't say anything really, does it? MrNiceGuy1113 (talk) 13:58, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Invalid and Removed - The page is not near completion. Please read the relevant AfD nomination guidelines before nominating a page. --Olowe2011 (talk) 14:01, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - It's a stub-class article that simply awaits expansion. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:28, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:04, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:04, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:04, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:43, 4 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge All - Merge all of 940s in Denmark, 950s in Denmark, 960s in Denmark, 970s in Denmark, 980s in Denmark and 990s in Denmark into 10th century in Denmark. The individual articles aren't notable enough to warrant separate articles. Vacation9 (talk) 18:45, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep all  List of notable events, like all the other chronological articles. This particular one now has half a dozen items, which is fully sufficient. There's been some question whether we should keep if there's one or two, but I think 6 is beyond question useful for navigation, which is the point of a list. TRhe individual items are notable, the list as a list does not have to be, just useful.   DGG ( talk ) 18:55, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per DGG. Automatic  Strikeout  23:49, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.