Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/97th Floor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:17, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

97th Floor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable marketing company, no coverage despite their fairly common name. Also likely UPE. Praxidicae (talk) 16:49, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Hyperbolick (talk) 21:49, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. The sources present in the article do not demonstrate notability, as they consist entirely of brief mentions (some in lists, e.g. a brief mention in a top 50 list is not significant coverage) and unreliable sources with either promotional language or user-generated content (reviews). I haven't found any outside sources that would satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Additionally, the article does not have any substantial encyclopedic content (or anything suggesting that such sources may exist), and what it has is verging on advertising, akin to the review sites in the references. Hence, delete as a non-notable company. ComplexRational (talk) 01:56, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - lacking significant coverage, poorly written, and possibly spam. Bearian (talk) 16:23, 13 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.