Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/99194853094755497 (number)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:39, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

99194853094755497 (number)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:27, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Seems to be nothing more than chat-like comments to me. Dolescum (talk) 08:42, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Source searches are only providing passing mentions (e.g., ). Northamerica1000(talk) 10:14, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Its only claim to notability is that it is the only cyclops prime which is also a Fibonacci prime but a) the article could not even manage to say this and b) cyclops primes are not considered notable. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:39, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.