Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/99 Burning


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mr.Z-man 23:32, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

99 Burning

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

band with only one independent release. lacks sources. many are listed but only one, an album review, (repeated, 2,6) mentions the band. no real claim to notability. fails WP:MUSIC Duffbeerforme (talk) 11:57, 19 August 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  14:27, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 04:46, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Do we generally delete articles about music rather than improving them? I followed the sources listed for reviews. I suspect that at the time the sources were added, the reviews were recent posts and so they appeared on the front pages of the sites, which is what the source refers to. I repaired these so that they point to the actual post. Also, if you know how to combine references, it would be cleaner for the source that is repeated to be listed once and referred to twice. Dscotese (talk) 00:47, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete This doesn't meet notability criteria.Hoponpop69 (talk) 23:00, 29 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.