Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9 Lazy 9


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 22:49, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

9 Lazy 9

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unnotable band. None of the minor sources I've seen are able to make this band even remotely notable. Ominateu (talk) 21:04, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, Music,  and Italy. Ominateu (talk) 21:04, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Allmusic biography and one two three non-trivial reviews, review by Exclaim! Magazine, review by Riverfront Times, featured on non-trivial list in RS, this retrospective, this review on a site I'm not familiar with. Geschichte (talk) 08:05, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep in view of the multiple reliable sources coverage identified above that together show a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:37, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep I think that it sounds like there are sources and coverage ThreeBootsInABucket (talk) 23:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.