Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9fans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Buck  ets  ofg 19:13, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

9fans

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable mailing list. There is a complete lack of secondary sources on the subject. Googling brings up a total of only 33 unique google hits. This has never been written about by a reliable secondary source. Just because several notable people have supposedly posted messages to a mailing list does not make it notable/encyclopedic by any stretch. Delete as lacking any secondary sources. Wickethewok 05:03, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, NN mailing list about a little-known (outside certain circles) operating system. No sources, fails WP:ATT. -- Dhartung | Talk 05:57, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable mailing list; no citations, no sources, no verification of notability.-- TBC Φ  talk?  06:00, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Non-verifiable, non-notable. -- Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  07:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable enough to deserve an article; no secondary references. utcursch | talk 11:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails to show/proove notability. - Denny 17:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete; violates WP:Attribution --Mhking 18:03, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Very few if any hits on google, non notable, no secondary references. PeteShanosky 23:01, 11 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.