Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A'amaal Ummi Dawud


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 07:32, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

A'amaal Ummi Dawud

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable "supplication". These "supplication" articles seem to have sprung up lately, all of them unsourced and deletion worthy. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 07:11, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 14 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete stub article with no viable possibility of expansion. LjL (talk) 00:36, 14 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Almost a WP:A1 or WP:A3 speedy deletion. Lacks coverage in reliable sources (checked both the Persian and English terms on Google News and Google Books; the 1–3 hits do not appear to be reliable sources), thus fails WP:GNG. - HyperGaruda (talk) 08:06, 14 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete I only just now realized it, but the nominator is correct - this isn't the only random supplication article that has popped up recently. In and of itself, the article still fails GNG on its own but the trend is something worth noting as well. MezzoMezzo (talk) 10:16, 17 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete because it fails to have multiple substantive discussion in reliable sources, i.e. it fails the general notability guidelines. Duas are for Allah, not encyclopedias. --Bejnar (talk) 02:15, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.