Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A'tris


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:43, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

A'tris

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NBAND with no reasonable location to redirect. AllMusic biography does not satisfy the "multiple" part of "multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself" criterion, which is adapted from WP:GNG. The SandDoctor Talk 17:30, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  The SandDoctor  Talk 17:30, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  The SandDoctor  Talk 17:30, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:17, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Keep - They seem to meet the "multiple sources" requirement at WP:NBAND; in addition to the brief AllMusic profile, they achieved some reliable newspaper coverage:, . There seems to be enough for a basic stub article, though the current text in the article needs to be reduced by a good 90% to facts that have been verified by someone other than their fans. On the other hand, they seem to have been ignored after some early good fortune. ☆  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) ☆ 00:17, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as has significant coverage in multiple reliable sources as identified above so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:10, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 00:39, 20 October 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   19:38, 27 October 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pamzeis (talk) 12:21, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - If my "Weak Keep" vote above is the reason for all this bureaucracy, just consider it to be Keep and wrap this up already. ☆  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) ☆ 13:40, 4 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.