Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A++


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  14:09, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

A++

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

bundled nomination. all three articles were created by gploc, and cover essentially the same topic.

gploc is the creator of these languages - he owns the websites https://lambda-bound.de/ and https://lambda-bound.com/. i do not know what the first one is, but the second promotes a book about a++.

a quick look for sources all lead back to primary sources and this book.

this nomination is bundled with:

ltb d l (talk) 13:55, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ltb d l (talk) 13:55, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

The second reason is that there are not many sources The third reason is that there are typographical errors. GQO (talk) 6:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete all. The language author has apparently written quite a lot on this topic, but as far as I can tell, one blog aside, nobody else has. ~ GQO  talk! 15:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * delete as A412. Notability would stem from multiple independent sources, and these just aren't independent of the language author. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: I was unable to find sources apart from the author about these topics when I searched. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk)  19:15, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete/redirect A++ to A+, delete others A+ is definitely a plausible typo, but the concept itself here is non-notable.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 23:56, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete for several reasons. The first reason is that there are no secondary sources
 * Delete Is there anything else than primary sources here? (rhetoric question) Rrjmrrr (talk) 09:11, 7 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.