Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A+ (rapper)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep: Withdrawn by nom, after references were added to verify WP:MUSICBIO criterion. Mattg82 (talk) 00:34, 22 January 2010 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

A+ (rapper)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable performer. No coverage in third-party reliable sources. Article has been unsourced since its creation in 2005. Sheep NotGoats  (Talk) 21:10, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Nice sources, although it's a shame it took five years and an AFD to get the article sourced. Can we SNOW keep this now, or withdraw it, or something? Sheep NotGoats   (Talk) 13:33, 21 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. Multiple sources exist to satisfy WP:MUSICBIO. For example, this Billboard article (and another), plus reviews at Allmusic(x2) and Vibe. Additionally, he has reached the U.S. album and singles charts, as well as the UK singles chart. I'll incorporate these sources in the next few hours. I've added these sources to the article.  Gongshow  Talk 22:02, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per Gongshow. Joe Chill (talk) 00:39, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Gong.--Epeefleche (talk) 01:15, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: per above. - Ret.Prof (talk) 14:47, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.