Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A-G requirements


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NOTGUIDE is a strong argument. There is a claim that independent sources exist, but none are presented here or in the article. Randykitty (talk) 16:51, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

A-G requirements

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not Notable. Every college has a list of requirements. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 06:08, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not a notable subject, and article doesn't prove anything -- like said, every college has these. – Broccoli &#38; Coffee (Oh hai) 06:57, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:21, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:21, 14 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a university enrolment guide. Ajf773 (talk) 09:14, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * No policy or guideline says that, therefore this vote is invalid and should be ignored. p  b  p  19:43, 14 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Strongest Possible Keep First off, subject IS notable. Nominator has obviously not followed BEFORE...if he had done a 5-second Google search, he would have quickly have found that there are plenty of websites dealing with this that are independent of the CSU and UC systems.  Also, some of the arguments for deletion here are quite specious.  For example, we've got a claim of WP:NOT even though university enrollment guides is not something listed under WP:NOT.  And this isn't just an "every college" situation, these are requirements used by over 30 institutions.  Collectively, these admissions requirements are used by more applicants than any other set of admissions requirements in these United States.   I frankly find it laughable that somebody would consider deleting a topic that is on a poster in basically every high school classroom in the state.  p  b  p  14:43, 14 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Also, you're thinking...why not a merge? Well, since this admission requirements serve two institutions, neither makes sense as a merge target.  p  b  p  14:43, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Under WP:NOT there is a sub-section called WP:NOTGUIDE. Wikipedia is not a guide. Ajf773 (talk) 19:04, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * That's a bit of a stretch, . None of the sub-examples of NOTGUIDE seem applicable if you ask me. Furthermore, I'd note that most of the subpoints of NOTGUIDE do not forbid content, instead they dictate writing style.  p  b  p  19:31, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:29, 21 November 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 05:54, 28 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.