Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A-Haunting We Will Go (play)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. One (talk) 02:00, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

A-Haunting We Will Go (play)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested PROD. Creator does not have an article, and the play has no reliable sources to establish notability. Glass  Cobra  12:03, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Addendum: Apologies, I was unaware of Tim Kelly's article. However, I will yield to community consensus on whether this play has enough coverage for a separate article or not. Glass  Cobra  14:17, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * To Glass Cobra: This play deserves a Wikipedia article because, when I signed up to participate in this play two years ago, I wanted to learn more about it, but I couldn't because there was at that time no information about it online, except for perhaps the publisher's website. So, I created this article. If anyone cared to read through the script (to which I added a link in the article itself), they would find that my summary is accurate. Future participants in this play deserve to be able to go to Wikipedia and learn what they're getting into. The same goes for audience members. As for "Creator does not have an article"? What does that mean?  Of course I do. I will address the issue of notability in due time.  I can't get to it now because I am in the middle of finals week. In the meantime, please don't take any drastic action. I should add that I took pains to improve this article once again.  Please tell me if they resolve the issues you have with this article. Ravenclaw7 (talk) 02:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment There is some third-party coverage in reliable sources, but it seems this play is mainly popular for school plays, so production and reception info will likely be insignificant. Tim Kelly (playwright) already mentions that he wrote this play. The rest of the current article is merely a plot summary (WP:NOT - currently under discussion). This play is already covered at www.playdatabase.com at similar length, but wikipedia doesn't allow articles on films either just because they have an entry on IMDb. – sgeureka t•c 07:29, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 16:28, 30 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable play by notable playwright. All sources seem to mention performances or mention it merely as a work of the playwright and are not focused on the play itself, i.e., no analysis or criticism of the play.  Therefore sources do not exist to establish notability or to create an encyclopedia article about the play. Drawn Some (talk) 17:04, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I've added links with reviews. The play is performed and Wikipedia entry may be useful for the readers and theatre fans. --Vejvančický (talk) 08:40, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pastor Theo (talk) 00:11, 7 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - Notable playwright, meets notability. Ed Fitzgerald t / c 11:50, 8 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.