Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A-YA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Erik9 (talk) 22:44, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

A-YA

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Serious prose issues, seems like a bad internet translation job. Sources are iffy; they look good initially, but the magazine is only mentioned one time in each source. Makes for questionable notability, bringing to community for consensus. Glass  Cobra  16:20, 21 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Keep. There seems to be enough coverage found by a Google Books search to show notability. Yes, there are plenty of false positives, but these seem to have coverage of the subject. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:38, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep I'm convinced by the references provided by Phil Brider but some of them should be added to the article. Drawn Some (talk) 00:24, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.