Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.C. Cesena in European football


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to A.C. Cesena. (non-admin closure) f  e  minist  03:45, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

A.C. Cesena in European football

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

One of a series of articles along these same lines, all very poorly sourced. None of which even suggest the notability of these particular games as a list. Seems to be the very essence of WP:INDISCRIMINATE.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:58, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep: Poorly sourced? The source is coming from UEFA themselves. The matches may not be particularly notable, but they are part of a European football series Template:Italian clubs in European football, similar to Template:English clubs in European football. Just because this is a short list, how does it differ from a longer list like Nottingham Forest F.C. in European football? You obviously found User:Disgusto through his recent vandalism and are deciding to attack his articles. I've improved the articles slightly by adding a reference each, but articles need time to develop, which deletionists do not understand. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:12, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment - in my view, it doesn't. But WP:OSE isn't a very valid argument.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:21, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * How did I know you were going to quote that? The problem with that is if you're deleting this, but not the other stuff, what's the point at all? This is another matter in itself. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:27, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:MULTIAFD.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:56, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Precedent with the other articles seems to be these are notable. If people disagree, the solution is not to pick them off one by one, it's to establish consensus that this type of article in general is not notable. Smartyllama (talk) 17:22, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment, actually, if you read WP:MULTIAFD, the suggested procedure is to have a discussion on one, and see where it leads, then do a multiple AfD. Other than your WP:OSE argument, do you have a policy based reason for keeping this article? Thanks for considering.  Onel 5969  TT me</i> 23:52, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep: I think it seems more in order that the article be improved rather than deleted. I see absolutely no reason why it should be deleted, it is notable enough for an article. Italia2006 (talk) 03:25, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:58, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:58, 1 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete How is this different from the main article on the club? Totally unwarranted stub. What possible additional content would it have?  DGG ( talk ) 15:42, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: Perhaps a summary of their time first time in European football and how they fared, as well as the addition of any future European matches they may take part in. <b style="color:black">Vaseline</b><b style="color:lightgrey">eeeeeee</b>★★★ 16:47, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  10:07, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - normally I'd err on the side of caution and say that the article needs improvement and not deletion, but since this club only participated once in European leagues what can realistically be done to have this article expanded. No comment on similar article but for this one at least all the information can just as adequately be contained in the main club article. Inter&#38;anthro (talk) 05:38, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment I would not be opposed to keeping article as a redirect as explained in the two !votes bellow. Inter&#38;anthro (talk) 16:15, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to section on main article, but keep as possible search term, similar to Bradford City A.F.C. in European football. GiantSnowman 06:55, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Merge and redirect . Include the match results in prose in the bit in the main article about qualifying for the UEFA Cup and the glory being short-lived. There's nowhere near enough content to warrant a spinoff from a main article that's less than 6kb readable prose. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:02, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Switching to Delete: not convinced the article title is a likely search term. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 09:00, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - There's only one entry in this list and it could be easily merged into the A.C. Cesena article. – PeeJay 14:56, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per PeeJay and per nom Spiderone  19:05, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric  06:11, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect per GiantSnowman's solution. This is a classic example of an article which doesn't (at present, pending any "golden era" at the club in question) need to be spun out from the main article on the club. There's bound to be a point where a list of European campaigns by a given team over time merits its own article, but I'll hazard the opinion that one individual tie isn't that point and leave the question for those with more knowledge in another venue. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 11:30, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect - they have played two matches in European competition, there is simply no need for a fork of such a small amount of content. I have already copied this section to the main club article. Fenix down (talk) 15:34, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I with Struway2 on this, I really don't see many people searching for Cesena in Europe considering they have had very little of it. Govvy (talk) 19:29, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: And Bradford City A.F.C. in European football does? Or Sheffield Wednesday F.C. in European football, or Millwall F.C. in European football as pages for that matter? <b style="color:black">Vaseline</b><b style="color:lightgrey">eeeeeee</b>★★★ 19:57, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect As the article is way too short in my opinion, I feel like that this deserve a redirect as this can be merged into A.C. Cesena article not its own seperate article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matt294069 (talk • contribs) 07:58, 11 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.